Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
The HC declined to adjudicate on the petitioner's role in the underlying business and, without deciding merits, authorised forensic analysis of the seized CPU subject to strict protective conditions to prevent access to third-party client data. The CPU, seized during a raid at a firm in which the petitioner's parents are partners, shall be inspected on 11 and 12 September 2025 from 11:00 onwards in the presence of designated persons and IT experts. The Court fixed a lump-sum fee of Rs.1,00,000 per HC IT official, to be borne equally by the petitioner and the revenue authority. Matter listed for further hearing on 30 October 2025.
The HC declined to adjudicate on the petitioner's role in the underlying business and, without deciding merits, authorised forensic analysis of the seized CPU subject to strict protective conditions to prevent access to third-party client data. The CPU, seized during a raid at a firm in which the petitioner's parents are partners, shall be inspected on 11 and 12 September 2025 from 11:00 onwards in the presence of designated persons and IT experts. The Court fixed a lump-sum fee of Rs.1,00,000 per HC IT official, to be borne equally by the petitioner and the revenue authority. Matter listed for further hearing on 30 October 2025.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
