Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4401 to 4420 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC declined to adjudicate on the petitioner's role in the underlying business and, without deciding merits, authorised forensic analysis of the seized CPU subject to strict protective conditions to prevent access to third-party client data. The CPU, seized during a raid at a firm in which the petitioner's parents are partners, shall be inspected on 11 and 12 September 2025 from 11:00 onwards in the presence of designated persons and IT experts. The Court fixed a lump-sum fee of Rs.1,00,000 per HC IT official, to be borne equally by the petitioner and the revenue authority. Matter listed for further hearing on 30 October 2025.
The HC declined to adjudicate on the petitioner's role in the underlying business and, without deciding merits, authorised forensic analysis of the seized CPU subject to strict protective conditions to prevent access to third-party client data. The CPU, seized during a raid at a firm in which the petitioner's parents are partners, shall be inspected on 11 and 12 September 2025 from 11:00 onwards in the presence of designated persons and IT experts. The Court fixed a lump-sum fee of Rs.1,00,000 per HC IT official, to be borne equally by the petitioner and the revenue authority. Matter listed for further hearing on 30 October 2025.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
