Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
The HC exercised its discretionary jurisdiction to condone delay in filing the appeal, finding the petitioner's reasons for delay bona fide, and thus set aside both the impugned assessment order issued by the first respondent and the rejection of the appeal by the second respondent. The Court granted the petitioner one opportunity to prosecute the appeal before the Appellate Authority subject to conditions: the petitioner must remit an additional 5% of the disputed tax in supplement to the 10% pre-deposit already paid at the time of filing, and such further deposit must be made within two weeks of receipt of this order. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
The HC exercised its discretionary jurisdiction to condone delay in filing the appeal, finding the petitioner's reasons for delay bona fide, and thus set aside both the impugned assessment order issued by the first respondent and the rejection of the appeal by the second respondent. The Court granted the petitioner one opportunity to prosecute the appeal before the Appellate Authority subject to conditions: the petitioner must remit an additional 5% of the disputed tax in supplement to the 10% pre-deposit already paid at the time of filing, and such further deposit must be made within two weeks of receipt of this order. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.