Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC dismissed the writ petition and upheld the impugned order, holding the petitioner liable for late fees under Section 47(2) of the TN GST Act for failure to furnish the annual return (GSTR-9) for AY 2021-22 in violation of Section 44 read with Rule 80. The court found no merit in the challenge, noting the petitioner did not file the return within three years; issuance of a notice under Rule 68/GSTR-3A did not obviate liability. The petitioner remains liable to pay late fee calculated at Rs.100 per day subject to the statutory ceiling of one quarter percent of turnover, and the petition is dismissed.
HC dismissed the writ petition and upheld the impugned order, holding the petitioner liable for late fees under Section 47(2) of the TN GST Act for failure to furnish the annual return (GSTR-9) for AY 2021-22 in violation of Section 44 read with Rule 80. The court found no merit in the challenge, noting the petitioner did not file the return within three years; issuance of a notice under Rule 68/GSTR-3A did not obviate liability. The petitioner remains liable to pay late fee calculated at Rs.100 per day subject to the statutory ceiling of one quarter percent of turnover, and the petition is dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
