Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)'s determination, rejecting the TPO's transfer pricing adjustment that valued shares at a higher rate on account of a premium paid by the assessee to its associated enterprise (AE). Relying on authoritative high court precedents and subsequent CBDT instruction, the Tribunal held the premium constituted a capital account transaction and did not amount to taxable income of the assessee. Consequently, the TP adjustment was annulled and the appeal by the revenue dismissed. The assessment order was set aside insofar as it enhanced income by treating the share premium as taxable, with the CIT(A) order upheld.
The ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)'s determination, rejecting the TPO's transfer pricing adjustment that valued shares at a higher rate on account of a premium paid by the assessee to its associated enterprise (AE). Relying on authoritative high court precedents and subsequent CBDT instruction, the Tribunal held the premium constituted a capital account transaction and did not amount to taxable income of the assessee. Consequently, the TP adjustment was annulled and the appeal by the revenue dismissed. The assessment order was set aside insofar as it enhanced income by treating the share premium as taxable, with the CIT(A) order upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
