Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned order, holding that the demand notice in Form 3 accompanied by invoices satisfied Rule 5 and Section 8 IBC requirements to establish operational debt and default; the notice was not rendered invalid on hyper-technical grounds where invoices were unchallenged as fabricated. The Tribunal erred in finding a pre-existing dispute: the alleged dispute arising from customs seizure post-dating the transactions was not evidenced by prior notice, suit or arbitration, and the liability remained uncrystallized given ongoing proceedings and the role of the clearing agent. Consequently the petition under Section 9 dismissed below is reinstated in favour of the Operational Creditor.
NCLAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned order, holding that the demand notice in Form 3 accompanied by invoices satisfied Rule 5 and Section 8 IBC requirements to establish operational debt and default; the notice was not rendered invalid on hyper-technical grounds where invoices were unchallenged as fabricated. The Tribunal erred in finding a pre-existing dispute: the alleged dispute arising from customs seizure post-dating the transactions was not evidenced by prior notice, suit or arbitration, and the liability remained uncrystallized given ongoing proceedings and the role of the clearing agent. Consequently the petition under Section 9 dismissed below is reinstated in favour of the Operational Creditor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.