Bank account freezing requires statutory authority; anti-money-laundering compliance and KYC monitoring do not permit unilateral indefinite restrictio...
Handicraft job work receives concessional GST only for registered principals and predominantly handmade goods; commercial resin articles remain taxabl...
The CESTAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order-in-original rejecting the appellant's claim for cash refund of service tax paid under reverse charge mechanism (RCM) after GST commenced on 01.07.2017. The Tribunal found no legal entitlement under the pre-GST or GST statutory framework, including Section 174(2)(C) CGST, for a cash refund of unutilised CENVAT/credit arising from RCM payments; the appellant's reliance on natural-justice and case law was rejected. The Tribunal held the impugned orders contained no infirmity in law or fact and accordingly confirmed denial of refund, dismissing the appeal with respect to all contested refund claims.
The CESTAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order-in-original rejecting the appellant's claim for cash refund of service tax paid under reverse charge mechanism (RCM) after GST commenced on 01.07.2017. The Tribunal found no legal entitlement under the pre-GST or GST statutory framework, including Section 174(2)(C) CGST, for a cash refund of unutilised CENVAT/credit arising from RCM payments; the appellant's reliance on natural-justice and case law was rejected. The Tribunal held the impugned orders contained no infirmity in law or fact and accordingly confirmed denial of refund, dismissing the appeal with respect to all contested refund claims.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
