Revenue classification: agricultural land treated as capital asset under s.2(14)(iii)(b); consideration fixed at Rs.1,00,44,000; s.54F exemption allow...
Appeal allowed, exemption under section 11 restored for not-for-profit company under section 12A carrying out charitable activities including micro-fi...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10881 to 10900 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that the petition alleging breach of natural justice did not disclose a clear-cut violation; absence of material evidence, including any test report, precluded reclassification of goods. The court found the question of blending capacity and machinery to be a disputed question of fact more appropriately resolved by the Appellate Authority through the statutory appellate process. The petitioner was not permitted to bypass the prescribed alternate remedy and was refused leave to deviate from exhaustion of remedies. Consequently, the petition was declined admission and dismissed, leaving the petitioner to pursue available statutory appeals before the appropriate administrative appellate forum.
The HC held that the petition alleging breach of natural justice did not disclose a clear-cut violation; absence of material evidence, including any test report, precluded reclassification of goods. The court found the question of blending capacity and machinery to be a disputed question of fact more appropriately resolved by the Appellate Authority through the statutory appellate process. The petitioner was not permitted to bypass the prescribed alternate remedy and was refused leave to deviate from exhaustion of remedies. Consequently, the petition was declined admission and dismissed, leaving the petitioner to pursue available statutory appeals before the appropriate administrative appellate forum.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.