Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned order that denied SHIS benefit and confirmed a demand of Rs.3,89,82,117 with interest. The Tribunal found that the appellant had surrendered the zero-duty EPCG benefit and paid Rs.57,75,000 (duty and interest) and that DGFT regularized the transaction by issuing duty-paid regularization letters, thereby validating simultaneous availment flexibility under applicable public notice and customs circulars. Applying the ratio of prior CESTAT authority, the Tribunal held the demand unsustainable as the appellant elected to surrender the EPCG benefit and complied with regularization, and accordingly dismissed the revenue demand and allowed the appeal.
CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned order that denied SHIS benefit and confirmed a demand of Rs.3,89,82,117 with interest. The Tribunal found that the appellant had surrendered the zero-duty EPCG benefit and paid Rs.57,75,000 (duty and interest) and that DGFT regularized the transaction by issuing duty-paid regularization letters, thereby validating simultaneous availment flexibility under applicable public notice and customs circulars. Applying the ratio of prior CESTAT authority, the Tribunal held the demand unsustainable as the appellant elected to surrender the EPCG benefit and complied with regularization, and accordingly dismissed the revenue demand and allowed the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
