Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT dismisses the appeal and upholds the impugned order in a Section 7 IBC proceeding, finding the financial creditor's application admissible. The tribunal held that the corporate debtor's contention of discharge pursuant to a revised sanction dated 18.11.2017 is unsustainable because all existing terms, including the guarantee clause, remained operative. No evidence establishes that the financial creditor discharged the corporate debtor's contingent liability as guarantor; a letter from the principal borrower seeking release of the guarantee post-renewal evidenced continuance rather than discharge. No infirmity was shown in the impugned order; appeal dismissed without any order as to costs.
NCLAT dismisses the appeal and upholds the impugned order in a Section 7 IBC proceeding, finding the financial creditor's application admissible. The tribunal held that the corporate debtor's contention of discharge pursuant to a revised sanction dated 18.11.2017 is unsustainable because all existing terms, including the guarantee clause, remained operative. No evidence establishes that the financial creditor discharged the corporate debtor's contingent liability as guarantor; a letter from the principal borrower seeking release of the guarantee post-renewal evidenced continuance rather than discharge. No infirmity was shown in the impugned order; appeal dismissed without any order as to costs.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.