Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and directed deletion of contested additions. The Tribunal held that additions under section 69C and for alleged personal use of vehicle were based on mere estimation and documents recovered from mobile devices without independent verification; such ad hoc disallowances in a search assessment lack cogent evidential foundation and cannot be sustained. The ITAT accepted the assessee's explanation and bank records showing third-party payment of travel expenses, and found no inquiry was conducted regarding the jewellery transaction or counter-party statements. Consequently, absent corroborative enquiries or supporting material, all impugned additions were deleted and the assessment revisited accordingly.
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and directed deletion of contested additions. The Tribunal held that additions under section 69C and for alleged personal use of vehicle were based on mere estimation and documents recovered from mobile devices without independent verification; such ad hoc disallowances in a search assessment lack cogent evidential foundation and cannot be sustained. The ITAT accepted the assessee's explanation and bank records showing third-party payment of travel expenses, and found no inquiry was conducted regarding the jewellery transaction or counter-party statements. Consequently, absent corroborative enquiries or supporting material, all impugned additions were deleted and the assessment revisited accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.