Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and directed deletion of contested additions. The Tribunal held that additions under section 69C and for alleged personal use of vehicle were based on mere estimation and documents recovered from mobile devices without independent verification; such ad hoc disallowances in a search assessment lack cogent evidential foundation and cannot be sustained. The ITAT accepted the assessee's explanation and bank records showing third-party payment of travel expenses, and found no inquiry was conducted regarding the jewellery transaction or counter-party statements. Consequently, absent corroborative enquiries or supporting material, all impugned additions were deleted and the assessment revisited accordingly.
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and directed deletion of contested additions. The Tribunal held that additions under section 69C and for alleged personal use of vehicle were based on mere estimation and documents recovered from mobile devices without independent verification; such ad hoc disallowances in a search assessment lack cogent evidential foundation and cannot be sustained. The ITAT accepted the assessee's explanation and bank records showing third-party payment of travel expenses, and found no inquiry was conducted regarding the jewellery transaction or counter-party statements. Consequently, absent corroborative enquiries or supporting material, all impugned additions were deleted and the assessment revisited accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.