Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and set aside penalty under s.271D. The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) erred in rejecting the defence of reasonable cause and applicability of the principle of mutuality; a society's bona fide belief that loans from members did not contravene s.269SS constituted a reasonable cause within the statutory scheme. Further, the impugned receipts had already been taxed, thereby losing the character of loan/deposit for penalty purposes under s.269SS, so levy of penalty under s.271D was not warranted. Result: penalty under s.271D vacated and appeal of the assessee allowed.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and set aside penalty under s.271D. The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) erred in rejecting the defence of reasonable cause and applicability of the principle of mutuality; a society's bona fide belief that loans from members did not contravene s.269SS constituted a reasonable cause within the statutory scheme. Further, the impugned receipts had already been taxed, thereby losing the character of loan/deposit for penalty purposes under s.269SS, so levy of penalty under s.271D was not warranted. Result: penalty under s.271D vacated and appeal of the assessee allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.