Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned Order-in-Appeal. It held that reimbursements of expenses recovered by the appellant in the course of Customs House Agent services do not attract service tax, in light of the Supreme Court (SC) precedent confirming that such reimbursements are excluded from taxable valuation prior to statutory amendment. Similarly, incentives/commissions received from airlines/shipping lines for sale of cargo space were held not taxable under Business Auxiliary Services for the relevant period, following binding tribunal precedent that pre-amendment commissions are outside the service tax net. Consequently the appellant's liability to pay service tax on both reimbursements and commissions was negated.
The CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned Order-in-Appeal. It held that reimbursements of expenses recovered by the appellant in the course of Customs House Agent services do not attract service tax, in light of the Supreme Court (SC) precedent confirming that such reimbursements are excluded from taxable valuation prior to statutory amendment. Similarly, incentives/commissions received from airlines/shipping lines for sale of cargo space were held not taxable under Business Auxiliary Services for the relevant period, following binding tribunal precedent that pre-amendment commissions are outside the service tax net. Consequently the appellant's liability to pay service tax on both reimbursements and commissions was negated.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.