Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC found a breach of natural justice where show-cause notices and orders under s.73 were only uploaded to the GST portal's "Additional Notices and Orders" tab, depriving the petitioner of effective service and opportunity to be heard; noting the disputed amount was deposited and no outstanding demand existed, the Court quashed and set aside the impugned order dated December 23, 2023, allowed the writ petition and directed that the petitioner may treat the impugned order as the final notice and submit a written reply within two weeks. The remedy was granted without relegation to alternative statutory remedies given the service failure.
The HC found a breach of natural justice where show-cause notices and orders under s.73 were only uploaded to the GST portal's "Additional Notices and Orders" tab, depriving the petitioner of effective service and opportunity to be heard; noting the disputed amount was deposited and no outstanding demand existed, the Court quashed and set aside the impugned order dated December 23, 2023, allowed the writ petition and directed that the petitioner may treat the impugned order as the final notice and submit a written reply within two weeks. The remedy was granted without relegation to alternative statutory remedies given the service failure.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.