Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The AAR held that the applicant's transaction constitutes a composite "works contract" under s.2(119) CGST, permitting ITC only on the structural steel/plant-and-machinery component as delineated in the contract Cost Abstract/Bill of Quantities, and not on civil or sheeting components. Cranes and HVAC were characterised as plant and machinery, supporting the secondary steel's eligibility. Concerning advances, the AAR ruled that time-of-supply principles in s.13(2) render receipt of advance as deemed receipt, and therefore ITC on supplier invoices for advance payments may be availed subject to the temporal limitation in s.16(4) - i.e., before 30 November following the FY or on filing the annual return, whichever is earlier.
The AAR held that the applicant's transaction constitutes a composite "works contract" under s.2(119) CGST, permitting ITC only on the structural steel/plant-and-machinery component as delineated in the contract Cost Abstract/Bill of Quantities, and not on civil or sheeting components. Cranes and HVAC were characterised as plant and machinery, supporting the secondary steel's eligibility. Concerning advances, the AAR ruled that time-of-supply principles in s.13(2) render receipt of advance as deemed receipt, and therefore ITC on supplier invoices for advance payments may be availed subject to the temporal limitation in s.16(4) - i.e., before 30 November following the FY or on filing the annual return, whichever is earlier.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.