Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
AAR held that consultation services and medicines dispensed to...
Consultation services and out-patient medicines are separate taxable supplies; in-patient supplies remain exempt composite health-care supply under GST
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
AAR held that consultation services and medicines dispensed to out-patients constitute distinct taxable supplies rather than a composite supply; medicines and consumables prescribed to out-patients are independent of the exempt health-care service and therefore subject to GST, whereas supplies integral to treatment of in-patients (including pharmacy-issued medicines and prescribed food) form part of the exempt composite health-care supply. Consequently, supplies to out-patients must be treated and invoiced as separate taxable supplies from the professional medical service, and are not subsumed under the exemption applicable to in-patient care.
AAR held that consultation services and medicines dispensed to out-patients constitute distinct taxable supplies rather than a composite supply; medicines and consumables prescribed to out-patients are independent of the exempt health-care service and therefore subject to GST, whereas supplies integral to treatment of in-patients (including pharmacy-issued medicines and prescribed food) form part of the exempt composite health-care supply. Consequently, supplies to out-patients must be treated and invoiced as separate taxable supplies from the professional medical service, and are not subsumed under the exemption applicable to in-patient care.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.