Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)'s order as cryptic and unsustainable, finding the AO's denial of the assessee's deduction under s.80IA was not supported by consideration of the assessee's submissions and the belated Form 10CCB audit report. The Tribunal remanded the matter to the CIT(A) to adjudicate afresh, directing that the previously filed submissions, the departmental acceptance of an identical claim for the initial assessment year, and the contemporaneous allowance of s.80JJA be given due weight. The AO/CIT(A) was instructed to decide the claim on merits in accordance with law after allowing the assessee an opportunity of personal hearing.
The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)'s order as cryptic and unsustainable, finding the AO's denial of the assessee's deduction under s.80IA was not supported by consideration of the assessee's submissions and the belated Form 10CCB audit report. The Tribunal remanded the matter to the CIT(A) to adjudicate afresh, directing that the previously filed submissions, the departmental acceptance of an identical claim for the initial assessment year, and the contemporaneous allowance of s.80JJA be given due weight. The AO/CIT(A) was instructed to decide the claim on merits in accordance with law after allowing the assessee an opportunity of personal hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.