Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The ITAT held that no "transfer" under section 2(47)(v) occurred in the assessment year 2010-11 because the JDA neither conferred ownership nor delivered possession or control of the land (no part performance under section 53A), and refundable interest-free deposits negated any absolute transfer; consequently the AO's deemed capital-gain assessment and resulting addition (confirmed by the CIT(A)) were deleted and the assessee's appeal allowed. The Tribunal further held receipts from sale of flats under the JDA constitute capital gains, not business income, and directed allowance of indexed cost of improvements and selling expenses; sale proceeds from plots were likewise held taxable as capital gains.
The ITAT held that no "transfer" under section 2(47)(v) occurred in the assessment year 2010-11 because the JDA neither conferred ownership nor delivered possession or control of the land (no part performance under section 53A), and refundable interest-free deposits negated any absolute transfer; consequently the AO's deemed capital-gain assessment and resulting addition (confirmed by the CIT(A)) were deleted and the assessee's appeal allowed. The Tribunal further held receipts from sale of flats under the JDA constitute capital gains, not business income, and directed allowance of indexed cost of improvements and selling expenses; sale proceeds from plots were likewise held taxable as capital gains.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
