Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT quashed the revisionary exercise by the Pr. CIT under s. 263, holding the Pr. CIT lacked jurisdiction to revise the assessment in respect of the assessee's claim for deduction under s. 80G relating to contributions from CSR funds. The Tribunal found the Assessing Officer had, in fact, examined the s. 80G claim by issuing a questionnaire and receiving detailed replies, and noted consistent tribunal precedents favoring the assessee's entitlement. Consequently the reassessment/ revision was set aside and the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, confirming the allowability of the s. 80G deduction in the assessment under challenge.
The ITAT quashed the revisionary exercise by the Pr. CIT under s. 263, holding the Pr. CIT lacked jurisdiction to revise the assessment in respect of the assessee's claim for deduction under s. 80G relating to contributions from CSR funds. The Tribunal found the Assessing Officer had, in fact, examined the s. 80G claim by issuing a questionnaire and receiving detailed replies, and noted consistent tribunal precedents favoring the assessee's entitlement. Consequently the reassessment/ revision was set aside and the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, confirming the allowability of the s. 80G deduction in the assessment under challenge.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.