Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT held that imported clear float glass is classifiable under CTH 7005 1090 (and thus eligible for the 'NIL' BCD benefit where applicable under the relevant notification for ASEAN imports), quashed the impugned orders and allowed the appeals. The Tribunal affirmed that taxation can be effected only by authority of law and the department cannot recover excess duty beyond legal liability, including in cases of self-assessment; payment of duty under protest is a permissible protective remedy. The Tribunal noted prior coordinate-bench precedent supporting the classification and emphasized that the adjudicative function requires impartial fact-finding, with departmental representatives obliged to assist the Tribunal in the administration of justice.
CESTAT held that imported clear float glass is classifiable under CTH 7005 1090 (and thus eligible for the 'NIL' BCD benefit where applicable under the relevant notification for ASEAN imports), quashed the impugned orders and allowed the appeals. The Tribunal affirmed that taxation can be effected only by authority of law and the department cannot recover excess duty beyond legal liability, including in cases of self-assessment; payment of duty under protest is a permissible protective remedy. The Tribunal noted prior coordinate-bench precedent supporting the classification and emphasized that the adjudicative function requires impartial fact-finding, with departmental representatives obliged to assist the Tribunal in the administration of justice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.