Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The NCLAT affirms the Adjudicating Authority's order, dismisses the appeal and directs refund of Rs.12,46,248 to the corporate debtor by 10.10.2025. The Tribunal held the interim resolution professional (IRP) withdrew Rs.2,62,564 and Rs.9,83,684 without Committee of Creditors' (CoC) ratification, rendering such withdrawals unauthorized and contrary to the IBC, CIRP Regulations and the Adjudicating Authority's order. The CoC validly replaced the IRP in accordance with s.27, and the replacement order attained finality. The resolution professional (RP) properly sought reimbursement; a Monitoring Committee (MC) may supervise plan implementation and delegate litigation to the erstwhile RP if authorized. No infirmity found in the impugned order.
The NCLAT affirms the Adjudicating Authority's order, dismisses the appeal and directs refund of Rs.12,46,248 to the corporate debtor by 10.10.2025. The Tribunal held the interim resolution professional (IRP) withdrew Rs.2,62,564 and Rs.9,83,684 without Committee of Creditors' (CoC) ratification, rendering such withdrawals unauthorized and contrary to the IBC, CIRP Regulations and the Adjudicating Authority's order. The CoC validly replaced the IRP in accordance with s.27, and the replacement order attained finality. The resolution professional (RP) properly sought reimbursement; a Monitoring Committee (MC) may supervise plan implementation and delegate litigation to the erstwhile RP if authorized. No infirmity found in the impugned order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
