Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT allowed the appeal of the Appellant, set aside the impugned order and quashed the demand for alleged short payment of service tax, holding that the Appellant validly availed Input Tax Credit of Rs.1,35,370 as supported by CA certificates and that a demand based solely on discrepancies between Form 26AS and ST-3 returns is untenable. The Tribunal found Revenue erred in raising demand without examining whether Form 26AS reflected gross receipts including exempted or abated amounts or whether differences arose from exemptions/abatements; Revenue must establish that the differential wholly constituted taxable consideration before presuming tax liability.
CESTAT allowed the appeal of the Appellant, set aside the impugned order and quashed the demand for alleged short payment of service tax, holding that the Appellant validly availed Input Tax Credit of Rs.1,35,370 as supported by CA certificates and that a demand based solely on discrepancies between Form 26AS and ST-3 returns is untenable. The Tribunal found Revenue erred in raising demand without examining whether Form 26AS reflected gross receipts including exempted or abated amounts or whether differences arose from exemptions/abatements; Revenue must establish that the differential wholly constituted taxable consideration before presuming tax liability.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
