Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
The HC found violation of the principles of natural justice for non-consideration of the reply to notice DRC 01A and quashed the impugned assessment order insofar as it reflected the retrospective rate change from 12% to 18% under the notification. The writ petition was disposed of by setting aside the assessment on terms: the petitioner must deposit 25% of the disputed tax from the Electronic Credit Ledger within 30 days of receipt of the order. Subject to this deposit and compliance with the terms, the impugned order stands quashed; no different remedial course was warranted on the facts and circumstances before the HC.
The HC found violation of the principles of natural justice for non-consideration of the reply to notice DRC 01A and quashed the impugned assessment order insofar as it reflected the retrospective rate change from 12% to 18% under the notification. The writ petition was disposed of by setting aside the assessment on terms: the petitioner must deposit 25% of the disputed tax from the Electronic Credit Ledger within 30 days of receipt of the order. Subject to this deposit and compliance with the terms, the impugned order stands quashed; no different remedial course was warranted on the facts and circumstances before the HC.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.