Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
The HC found violation of the principles of natural justice for non-consideration of the reply to notice DRC 01A and quashed the impugned assessment order insofar as it reflected the retrospective rate change from 12% to 18% under the notification. The writ petition was disposed of by setting aside the assessment on terms: the petitioner must deposit 25% of the disputed tax from the Electronic Credit Ledger within 30 days of receipt of the order. Subject to this deposit and compliance with the terms, the impugned order stands quashed; no different remedial course was warranted on the facts and circumstances before the HC.
The HC found violation of the principles of natural justice for non-consideration of the reply to notice DRC 01A and quashed the impugned assessment order insofar as it reflected the retrospective rate change from 12% to 18% under the notification. The writ petition was disposed of by setting aside the assessment on terms: the petitioner must deposit 25% of the disputed tax from the Electronic Credit Ledger within 30 days of receipt of the order. Subject to this deposit and compliance with the terms, the impugned order stands quashed; no different remedial course was warranted on the facts and circumstances before the HC.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.