Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
The HC found violation of the principles of natural justice for non-consideration of the reply to notice DRC 01A and quashed the impugned assessment order insofar as it reflected the retrospective rate change from 12% to 18% under the notification. The writ petition was disposed of by setting aside the assessment on terms: the petitioner must deposit 25% of the disputed tax from the Electronic Credit Ledger within 30 days of receipt of the order. Subject to this deposit and compliance with the terms, the impugned order stands quashed; no different remedial course was warranted on the facts and circumstances before the HC.
The HC found violation of the principles of natural justice for non-consideration of the reply to notice DRC 01A and quashed the impugned assessment order insofar as it reflected the retrospective rate change from 12% to 18% under the notification. The writ petition was disposed of by setting aside the assessment on terms: the petitioner must deposit 25% of the disputed tax from the Electronic Credit Ledger within 30 days of receipt of the order. Subject to this deposit and compliance with the terms, the impugned order stands quashed; no different remedial course was warranted on the facts and circumstances before the HC.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.