Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging issuance of Form GST DRC-01 dated 30.05.2025, holding that the petitioner's challenge was premature as no reply had been filed to the earlier Form GST DRC-01A dated 11.04.2025 issued under s.74(5) of the TNGST Act, 2017. The court found the petitioner's demand objection unsustainable in absence of a reply and declined substantive interference. Liberty was granted to the petitioner to file a reply/objection to the DRC-01 within two weeks of receipt of the order; on receipt, the respondent must consider it, issue a clear 14-day notice fixing a personal hearing, and thereafter pass orders on merits expeditiously and in accordance with law.
The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging issuance of Form GST DRC-01 dated 30.05.2025, holding that the petitioner's challenge was premature as no reply had been filed to the earlier Form GST DRC-01A dated 11.04.2025 issued under s.74(5) of the TNGST Act, 2017. The court found the petitioner's demand objection unsustainable in absence of a reply and declined substantive interference. Liberty was granted to the petitioner to file a reply/objection to the DRC-01 within two weeks of receipt of the order; on receipt, the respondent must consider it, issue a clear 14-day notice fixing a personal hearing, and thereafter pass orders on merits expeditiously and in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
