Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
The HC dismissed the appeal, holding the writ petition challenging the assessment order and subsequent suo motu rectification (with imposition of penalty) to be not maintainable because an efficacious statutory remedy exists under s.107 of the GST Act. Although the writ court noted defects in rectification proceedings concerning natural justice, the HC found that all legal and factual grievances arising from the assessment and rectification can be effectively ventilated before the appellate authority under s.107. The appellant was granted liberty to pursue the statutory appeal; consequently the writ relief was refused and the Single Judge's dismissal affirmed, with no interference in the impugned orders.
The HC dismissed the appeal, holding the writ petition challenging the assessment order and subsequent suo motu rectification (with imposition of penalty) to be not maintainable because an efficacious statutory remedy exists under s.107 of the GST Act. Although the writ court noted defects in rectification proceedings concerning natural justice, the HC found that all legal and factual grievances arising from the assessment and rectification can be effectively ventilated before the appellate authority under s.107. The appellant was granted liberty to pursue the statutory appeal; consequently the writ relief was refused and the Single Judge's dismissal affirmed, with no interference in the impugned orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
