Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
The HC dismissed the appeal, holding the writ petition challenging the assessment order and subsequent suo motu rectification (with imposition of penalty) to be not maintainable because an efficacious statutory remedy exists under s.107 of the GST Act. Although the writ court noted defects in rectification proceedings concerning natural justice, the HC found that all legal and factual grievances arising from the assessment and rectification can be effectively ventilated before the appellate authority under s.107. The appellant was granted liberty to pursue the statutory appeal; consequently the writ relief was refused and the Single Judge's dismissal affirmed, with no interference in the impugned orders.
The HC dismissed the appeal, holding the writ petition challenging the assessment order and subsequent suo motu rectification (with imposition of penalty) to be not maintainable because an efficacious statutory remedy exists under s.107 of the GST Act. Although the writ court noted defects in rectification proceedings concerning natural justice, the HC found that all legal and factual grievances arising from the assessment and rectification can be effectively ventilated before the appellate authority under s.107. The appellant was granted liberty to pursue the statutory appeal; consequently the writ relief was refused and the Single Judge's dismissal affirmed, with no interference in the impugned orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
