Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
The HC dismissed the appeal, holding the writ petition challenging the assessment order and subsequent suo motu rectification (with imposition of penalty) to be not maintainable because an efficacious statutory remedy exists under s.107 of the GST Act. Although the writ court noted defects in rectification proceedings concerning natural justice, the HC found that all legal and factual grievances arising from the assessment and rectification can be effectively ventilated before the appellate authority under s.107. The appellant was granted liberty to pursue the statutory appeal; consequently the writ relief was refused and the Single Judge's dismissal affirmed, with no interference in the impugned orders.
The HC dismissed the appeal, holding the writ petition challenging the assessment order and subsequent suo motu rectification (with imposition of penalty) to be not maintainable because an efficacious statutory remedy exists under s.107 of the GST Act. Although the writ court noted defects in rectification proceedings concerning natural justice, the HC found that all legal and factual grievances arising from the assessment and rectification can be effectively ventilated before the appellate authority under s.107. The appellant was granted liberty to pursue the statutory appeal; consequently the writ relief was refused and the Single Judge's dismissal affirmed, with no interference in the impugned orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
