Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC allowed the petition and granted relief, holding that a 31-day delay in filing Form No.10B for AY 2020-21 constituted reasonable cause warranting condonation under section 119. The Court found the preponement of the Form No.10B due date for AY 2020-21, inadvertent oversight by the Petitioner and their auditor, pandemic-related lockdowns, and closure of the Petitioner's institution to be bona fide explanations. It concluded that refusal to condone delay would have caused genuine hardship by depriving the Petitioner of exemption under section 11 and by sustaining a demand. The HC quashed the impugned order under section 119(2)(b) and condoned the 31-day delay.
The HC allowed the petition and granted relief, holding that a 31-day delay in filing Form No.10B for AY 2020-21 constituted reasonable cause warranting condonation under section 119. The Court found the preponement of the Form No.10B due date for AY 2020-21, inadvertent oversight by the Petitioner and their auditor, pandemic-related lockdowns, and closure of the Petitioner's institution to be bona fide explanations. It concluded that refusal to condone delay would have caused genuine hardship by depriving the Petitioner of exemption under section 11 and by sustaining a demand. The HC quashed the impugned order under section 119(2)(b) and condoned the 31-day delay.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
