Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
ITAT held that the belated return filed on 07/09/2023 was defective under clause (ca) of the Explanation to s.139(9) and could not be revised; nonetheless, invoking Article 265, the Tribunal found that the assessee suffered undue tax burden due to incorrect income and TDS figures furnished by a tax consultant and that absence of a statutory revision mechanism should not prejudice the taxpayer. The matter is restored to the learned JAO with directions to afford the assessee an opportunity either to file a corrected return within a specified window or, alternatively, to submit a correct computation of income with supporting documents for assessment, and to proceed thereafter in accordance with law.
ITAT held that the belated return filed on 07/09/2023 was defective under clause (ca) of the Explanation to s.139(9) and could not be revised; nonetheless, invoking Article 265, the Tribunal found that the assessee suffered undue tax burden due to incorrect income and TDS figures furnished by a tax consultant and that absence of a statutory revision mechanism should not prejudice the taxpayer. The matter is restored to the learned JAO with directions to afford the assessee an opportunity either to file a corrected return within a specified window or, alternatively, to submit a correct computation of income with supporting documents for assessment, and to proceed thereafter in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
