Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT dismisses the assessee's challenges to the PCIT's exercise of jurisdiction under s.263 and upholds the show-cause notice; grounds 1-3 are rejected. The Tribunal finds a direct connection between the recorded reasons and the sale of immovable property, concluding the AO ought to have examined the transaction, cost of acquisition, any prior capital gains adjustments and the assessee's claim under s.54F. ITAT holds the assessment order for A.Y. 2015-16 passed u/s.147 read with s.144B is erroneous and prejudicial to revenue, and confirms PCIT's action setting aside the matter to the file of the AO for fresh enquiry and determination of the s.54F claim.
ITAT dismisses the assessee's challenges to the PCIT's exercise of jurisdiction under s.263 and upholds the show-cause notice; grounds 1-3 are rejected. The Tribunal finds a direct connection between the recorded reasons and the sale of immovable property, concluding the AO ought to have examined the transaction, cost of acquisition, any prior capital gains adjustments and the assessee's claim under s.54F. ITAT holds the assessment order for A.Y. 2015-16 passed u/s.147 read with s.144B is erroneous and prejudicial to revenue, and confirms PCIT's action setting aside the matter to the file of the AO for fresh enquiry and determination of the s.54F claim.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.