Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT upheld the rejection of the assessee's claim for relief under Article 11 of the India-Germany DTAA when determining tax on distributed profits under section 115-O. The Tribunal ruled that liability for Additional Income-tax on dividends rests with the domestic company at the statutory rate prescribed by section 115-O, and treaty rates applicable to the non-resident shareholder do not alter the company's DDT obligation unless the Contracting States explicitly extend treaty protection to the domestic remitter. Consequently, the appellate relief sought to recalibrate DDT in line with the DTAA was denied and the appeal was decided against the assessee.
ITAT upheld the rejection of the assessee's claim for relief under Article 11 of the India-Germany DTAA when determining tax on distributed profits under section 115-O. The Tribunal ruled that liability for Additional Income-tax on dividends rests with the domestic company at the statutory rate prescribed by section 115-O, and treaty rates applicable to the non-resident shareholder do not alter the company's DDT obligation unless the Contracting States explicitly extend treaty protection to the domestic remitter. Consequently, the appellate relief sought to recalibrate DDT in line with the DTAA was denied and the appeal was decided against the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.