Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT dismissed the appeal, holding that the assessee's revised return under s.139(5) filed on 05.08.2022, after the due date for exercising the option under s.115BAC, did not validly opt for the new tax regime; therefore the AO/CPC correctly disregarded the option. The Tribunal found the statutory mandate under s.115BAC(5) not complied with, rejected reliance on contrary authority, and affirmed that fiscal provisions permit no liberal construction. Consequently, the late-filed revision could not cure the failure to exercise the option within the prescribed time and the assessment stands unaffected by the assessee's belated choice; appeal dismissed.
ITAT dismissed the appeal, holding that the assessee's revised return under s.139(5) filed on 05.08.2022, after the due date for exercising the option under s.115BAC, did not validly opt for the new tax regime; therefore the AO/CPC correctly disregarded the option. The Tribunal found the statutory mandate under s.115BAC(5) not complied with, rejected reliance on contrary authority, and affirmed that fiscal provisions permit no liberal construction. Consequently, the late-filed revision could not cure the failure to exercise the option within the prescribed time and the assessment stands unaffected by the assessee's belated choice; appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.