Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT dismissed the appeal, holding that the assessee's revised return under s.139(5) filed on 05.08.2022, after the due date for exercising the option under s.115BAC, did not validly opt for the new tax regime; therefore the AO/CPC correctly disregarded the option. The Tribunal found the statutory mandate under s.115BAC(5) not complied with, rejected reliance on contrary authority, and affirmed that fiscal provisions permit no liberal construction. Consequently, the late-filed revision could not cure the failure to exercise the option within the prescribed time and the assessment stands unaffected by the assessee's belated choice; appeal dismissed.
ITAT dismissed the appeal, holding that the assessee's revised return under s.139(5) filed on 05.08.2022, after the due date for exercising the option under s.115BAC, did not validly opt for the new tax regime; therefore the AO/CPC correctly disregarded the option. The Tribunal found the statutory mandate under s.115BAC(5) not complied with, rejected reliance on contrary authority, and affirmed that fiscal provisions permit no liberal construction. Consequently, the late-filed revision could not cure the failure to exercise the option within the prescribed time and the assessment stands unaffected by the assessee's belated choice; appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.