Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT set aside the CIT(E)'s refusal to grant registration under s.12AB and remitted the matter to the file of the CIT(E) for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal held that the CIT(E)'s conclusion-that the s.8 company merely supplied personnel to a CSR-donor in exchange for contributions and therefore its activities fell outside s.2(15)-was based on suspicion and surmise without evidentiary foundation. The ITAT noted the appellant/assessee had produced project reports and supporting documents showing charitable works (village road and school building projects), and directed the CIT(E) to reassess the application on the basis of the evidentiary record.
The ITAT set aside the CIT(E)'s refusal to grant registration under s.12AB and remitted the matter to the file of the CIT(E) for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal held that the CIT(E)'s conclusion-that the s.8 company merely supplied personnel to a CSR-donor in exchange for contributions and therefore its activities fell outside s.2(15)-was based on suspicion and surmise without evidentiary foundation. The ITAT noted the appellant/assessee had produced project reports and supporting documents showing charitable works (village road and school building projects), and directed the CIT(E) to reassess the application on the basis of the evidentiary record.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
