Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT sustained a restricted addition of Rs. 4,65,000 to the assessee's income for A.Y. 2015-16, applying a 25% estimation rate to the net alleged unaccounted expenditure derived from the seized diary. The Tribunal held that the AO's aggregation of only positive diary balances without third-party verification led to potential overstatement; accordingly, a calibrated discount was warranted to account for duplications, negative balances, vendor confirmations produced on appeal, valuation evidence indicating lower total cost than accounted payments, and absence of AO inquiries under section 131/133(6). No separate addition was sustained for A.Y. 2016-17.
ITAT sustained a restricted addition of Rs. 4,65,000 to the assessee's income for A.Y. 2015-16, applying a 25% estimation rate to the net alleged unaccounted expenditure derived from the seized diary. The Tribunal held that the AO's aggregation of only positive diary balances without third-party verification led to potential overstatement; accordingly, a calibrated discount was warranted to account for duplications, negative balances, vendor confirmations produced on appeal, valuation evidence indicating lower total cost than accounted payments, and absence of AO inquiries under section 131/133(6). No separate addition was sustained for A.Y. 2016-17.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.