Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
The HC set aside the impugned demand order and remanded the matter to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh adjudication, finding a breach of audi alteram partem where the SCN and subsequent notices were uploaded only to the "Additional Notices" tab and the Petitioner was not afforded a real opportunity to be heard. The Petitioner is granted time until 15 October 2025 to file a reply to the SCN; thereafter the Adjudicating Authority shall issue a personal hearing notice (not merely portal upload) and proceed afresh. The petition is allowed by way of remand.
The HC set aside the impugned demand order and remanded the matter to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh adjudication, finding a breach of audi alteram partem where the SCN and subsequent notices were uploaded only to the "Additional Notices" tab and the Petitioner was not afforded a real opportunity to be heard. The Petitioner is granted time until 15 October 2025 to file a reply to the SCN; thereafter the Adjudicating Authority shall issue a personal hearing notice (not merely portal upload) and proceed afresh. The petition is allowed by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.