Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT held that where deemed consideration under s.50C is apparent from the return and corroborated by AIR/sale deed, the AO may make adjustments while processing under s.143(1); the assessee's contention that such adjustment is a purely debatable issue was rejected. However, because title disputes and a writ challenging the SRO-fixed FMV are pending, the SRO value cannot be treated as deemed consideration for s.50C, and the AO is obliged to refer valuation to the DVO. The ITAT set aside the CIT(A) order for lack of clear directions and restored the matter to the AO for de novo adjudication. Appeal of the assessee allowed for statistical purposes.
The ITAT held that where deemed consideration under s.50C is apparent from the return and corroborated by AIR/sale deed, the AO may make adjustments while processing under s.143(1); the assessee's contention that such adjustment is a purely debatable issue was rejected. However, because title disputes and a writ challenging the SRO-fixed FMV are pending, the SRO value cannot be treated as deemed consideration for s.50C, and the AO is obliged to refer valuation to the DVO. The ITAT set aside the CIT(A) order for lack of clear directions and restored the matter to the AO for de novo adjudication. Appeal of the assessee allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.