Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal and partly allowed the assessee's cross-objection. Applying TNMM, the Tribunal upheld CIT(A)'s exclusion of four large-turnover comparables as non-comparable with the assessee's small captive software/ITES segment, and directed exclusion of ICRA Techno Analytics on RPT grounds. The Tribunal held provisions for bad and doubtful debts are operating expenses and ordered margin adjustments of comparables accordingly. The AO's additional disallowance of tax provisions/MAT credit was found to cause double disallowance; AO was directed to commence income computation from profit before tax, thereby deleting the impugned disallowance. Case remitted for compliance with these directions.
ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal and partly allowed the assessee's cross-objection. Applying TNMM, the Tribunal upheld CIT(A)'s exclusion of four large-turnover comparables as non-comparable with the assessee's small captive software/ITES segment, and directed exclusion of ICRA Techno Analytics on RPT grounds. The Tribunal held provisions for bad and doubtful debts are operating expenses and ordered margin adjustments of comparables accordingly. The AO's additional disallowance of tax provisions/MAT credit was found to cause double disallowance; AO was directed to commence income computation from profit before tax, thereby deleting the impugned disallowance. Case remitted for compliance with these directions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.