Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the Adjudicating Authority's relief setting aside the Section 7 proceedings. The Tribunal found prima facie back-dated and fabricated documents, conversion of earlier investments into alleged financial debt, and undisclosed related-party nexus between the Financial Creditor (FC) and the Corporate Debtor (CD) under s.5(24) of the IBC, establishing collusion to defraud other creditors. On piercing the corporate veil the Tribunal held the initiation of CIRP to be mala fide, allowing the respondents' s.65 application despite its late filing; fraud vitiates proceedings irrespective of CIRP stage. No infirmity was found in the AA's order and the appeal was dismissed.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the Adjudicating Authority's relief setting aside the Section 7 proceedings. The Tribunal found prima facie back-dated and fabricated documents, conversion of earlier investments into alleged financial debt, and undisclosed related-party nexus between the Financial Creditor (FC) and the Corporate Debtor (CD) under s.5(24) of the IBC, establishing collusion to defraud other creditors. On piercing the corporate veil the Tribunal held the initiation of CIRP to be mala fide, allowing the respondents' s.65 application despite its late filing; fraud vitiates proceedings irrespective of CIRP stage. No infirmity was found in the AA's order and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.