Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The HC held that proceedings under s.74 of the UPGST/CGST Act were initiated against the petitioner following a survey that disclosed discrepancies, and an ex parte order fixed evaded sales and corresponding tax, interest and penalty without affording the petitioner a hearing on purchases, thereby violating principles of natural justice. The impugned order's fixation of evaded sales in excess of evaded purchases lacked reasoned justification and was arbitrary. Consequently, the HC quashed the impugned orders and remitted the matter for fresh consideration consistent with statutory mandate and audi alteram partem, directing reconsideration of determination of purchases, evaded turnover and resultant liabilities.
The HC held that proceedings under s.74 of the UPGST/CGST Act were initiated against the petitioner following a survey that disclosed discrepancies, and an ex parte order fixed evaded sales and corresponding tax, interest and penalty without affording the petitioner a hearing on purchases, thereby violating principles of natural justice. The impugned order's fixation of evaded sales in excess of evaded purchases lacked reasoned justification and was arbitrary. Consequently, the HC quashed the impugned orders and remitted the matter for fresh consideration consistent with statutory mandate and audi alteram partem, directing reconsideration of determination of purchases, evaded turnover and resultant liabilities.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
