Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that proceedings under s.74 of the UPGST/CGST Act were initiated against the petitioner following a survey that disclosed discrepancies, and an ex parte order fixed evaded sales and corresponding tax, interest and penalty without affording the petitioner a hearing on purchases, thereby violating principles of natural justice. The impugned order's fixation of evaded sales in excess of evaded purchases lacked reasoned justification and was arbitrary. Consequently, the HC quashed the impugned orders and remitted the matter for fresh consideration consistent with statutory mandate and audi alteram partem, directing reconsideration of determination of purchases, evaded turnover and resultant liabilities.
The HC held that proceedings under s.74 of the UPGST/CGST Act were initiated against the petitioner following a survey that disclosed discrepancies, and an ex parte order fixed evaded sales and corresponding tax, interest and penalty without affording the petitioner a hearing on purchases, thereby violating principles of natural justice. The impugned order's fixation of evaded sales in excess of evaded purchases lacked reasoned justification and was arbitrary. Consequently, the HC quashed the impugned orders and remitted the matter for fresh consideration consistent with statutory mandate and audi alteram partem, directing reconsideration of determination of purchases, evaded turnover and resultant liabilities.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
