Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
The HC dismissed the petitions and upheld the impugned orders, finding that the petitioner failed to rebut the intimations that he migrated from the composition scheme to the regular scheme. The record established non-response to show-cause notices, no filing of returns, and non-payment of tax; no evidence was produced demonstrating any challenge to the intimation, reversal by a competent forum, or continued status as a composition taxpayer. Having neither responded to statutory notices nor appeared before the proper officer, the petitioner's belated assertion on appeal that he never opted out of the composition scheme was held to be unsubstantiated and insufficient to vitiate the impugned action. Petition dismissed.
The HC dismissed the petitions and upheld the impugned orders, finding that the petitioner failed to rebut the intimations that he migrated from the composition scheme to the regular scheme. The record established non-response to show-cause notices, no filing of returns, and non-payment of tax; no evidence was produced demonstrating any challenge to the intimation, reversal by a competent forum, or continued status as a composition taxpayer. Having neither responded to statutory notices nor appeared before the proper officer, the petitioner's belated assertion on appeal that he never opted out of the composition scheme was held to be unsubstantiated and insufficient to vitiate the impugned action. Petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.