Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The HC dismissed the petitions and upheld the impugned orders, finding that the petitioner failed to rebut the intimations that he migrated from the composition scheme to the regular scheme. The record established non-response to show-cause notices, no filing of returns, and non-payment of tax; no evidence was produced demonstrating any challenge to the intimation, reversal by a competent forum, or continued status as a composition taxpayer. Having neither responded to statutory notices nor appeared before the proper officer, the petitioner's belated assertion on appeal that he never opted out of the composition scheme was held to be unsubstantiated and insufficient to vitiate the impugned action. Petition dismissed.
The HC dismissed the petitions and upheld the impugned orders, finding that the petitioner failed to rebut the intimations that he migrated from the composition scheme to the regular scheme. The record established non-response to show-cause notices, no filing of returns, and non-payment of tax; no evidence was produced demonstrating any challenge to the intimation, reversal by a competent forum, or continued status as a composition taxpayer. Having neither responded to statutory notices nor appeared before the proper officer, the petitioner's belated assertion on appeal that he never opted out of the composition scheme was held to be unsubstantiated and insufficient to vitiate the impugned action. Petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
