Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
HC set aside the impugned orders and quashed the appellate rejection based solely on delay, holding that the petitioner was entitled to a reasonable opportunity to adduce material evidence concerning GST exemption on specified rice transactions. The court directed the petitioner to produce invoices and corroborative evidence within two months and ordered the competent authority to schedule an oral hearing, consider the newly produced material, and pass a fresh speaking order within four months. The matter is remitted for fresh adjudication on merits limited to the exemption claim; petition allowed and prior orders dated 15.04.2025, 27.04.2024 and 28.04.2024 set aside.
HC set aside the impugned orders and quashed the appellate rejection based solely on delay, holding that the petitioner was entitled to a reasonable opportunity to adduce material evidence concerning GST exemption on specified rice transactions. The court directed the petitioner to produce invoices and corroborative evidence within two months and ordered the competent authority to schedule an oral hearing, consider the newly produced material, and pass a fresh speaking order within four months. The matter is remitted for fresh adjudication on merits limited to the exemption claim; petition allowed and prior orders dated 15.04.2025, 27.04.2024 and 28.04.2024 set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
