Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
HC set aside the impugned orders and quashed the appellate rejection based solely on delay, holding that the petitioner was entitled to a reasonable opportunity to adduce material evidence concerning GST exemption on specified rice transactions. The court directed the petitioner to produce invoices and corroborative evidence within two months and ordered the competent authority to schedule an oral hearing, consider the newly produced material, and pass a fresh speaking order within four months. The matter is remitted for fresh adjudication on merits limited to the exemption claim; petition allowed and prior orders dated 15.04.2025, 27.04.2024 and 28.04.2024 set aside.
HC set aside the impugned orders and quashed the appellate rejection based solely on delay, holding that the petitioner was entitled to a reasonable opportunity to adduce material evidence concerning GST exemption on specified rice transactions. The court directed the petitioner to produce invoices and corroborative evidence within two months and ordered the competent authority to schedule an oral hearing, consider the newly produced material, and pass a fresh speaking order within four months. The matter is remitted for fresh adjudication on merits limited to the exemption claim; petition allowed and prior orders dated 15.04.2025, 27.04.2024 and 28.04.2024 set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
