Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT upheld that additions under section 69C could not be conclusively determined on the record and remanded the matter to the AO for fresh verification and adjudication. The tribunal accepted that the assessee paid GST, interest and penalty and submitted delivery challans, ledger and bank statements, but found absence of stock registers and incontrovertible proof of physical receipt undermining the claim of genuine purchases. Reliance on a spouse's favourable order and on precedents was rejected as distinguishable. Consequently, the appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes only, with directions to the AO to examine actual movement of goods, genuineness of purchases and correct tax treatment (including assessment under section 115BBE versus regular business income).
ITAT upheld that additions under section 69C could not be conclusively determined on the record and remanded the matter to the AO for fresh verification and adjudication. The tribunal accepted that the assessee paid GST, interest and penalty and submitted delivery challans, ledger and bank statements, but found absence of stock registers and incontrovertible proof of physical receipt undermining the claim of genuine purchases. Reliance on a spouse's favourable order and on precedents was rejected as distinguishable. Consequently, the appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes only, with directions to the AO to examine actual movement of goods, genuineness of purchases and correct tax treatment (including assessment under section 115BBE versus regular business income).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.