Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
ITAT upheld that additions under section 69C could not be conclusively determined on the record and remanded the matter to the AO for fresh verification and adjudication. The tribunal accepted that the assessee paid GST, interest and penalty and submitted delivery challans, ledger and bank statements, but found absence of stock registers and incontrovertible proof of physical receipt undermining the claim of genuine purchases. Reliance on a spouse's favourable order and on precedents was rejected as distinguishable. Consequently, the appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes only, with directions to the AO to examine actual movement of goods, genuineness of purchases and correct tax treatment (including assessment under section 115BBE versus regular business income).
ITAT upheld that additions under section 69C could not be conclusively determined on the record and remanded the matter to the AO for fresh verification and adjudication. The tribunal accepted that the assessee paid GST, interest and penalty and submitted delivery challans, ledger and bank statements, but found absence of stock registers and incontrovertible proof of physical receipt undermining the claim of genuine purchases. Reliance on a spouse's favourable order and on precedents was rejected as distinguishable. Consequently, the appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes only, with directions to the AO to examine actual movement of goods, genuineness of purchases and correct tax treatment (including assessment under section 115BBE versus regular business income).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
